Friends With Benefits

An article called "Friends With Benefits: Do facebook Friends Provide the Same Support as Those in Real Life?" by Kate Dailey,  is mainly about certain benefits that facebooks' social media has to offer. Dailey, used an example of a long lost friend who posted on facebook about a tragic event of a death. Even though Dailey felt surprised that someone would post such news but later realized that facebook is the "perfect venue" for tragic news. With that being said, Dailey argued the benefits of virtual friends in a bigger picture. Even though studies have shown that a "strong network of friends can be crucial to getting through a crisis and can help one be healthier in general" she then questioned whether virtual friendships could be just as beneficial. Dailey then conducted her own "polls" and found out that facebook doesn't make friends, better friends; it makes acquaintances better acquaintances in many ways. It is a way for others to learn about new jobs, tragic stories, everyday life etc and when others comment on certain events, facebook users may get a boost in self esteem when others react to their posts. 

Facebook is a wonderful way of staying connected with everyone. Whether it is relatives who live far away, a friend you see everyday, or a next door neighbor. It is not meant to replace face to face friendships, but used as an alternative for those who want to share different events in their lives with people they know. In return, some friendships may develop, or get better. Some can gain from social media in many ways. 

Blog 10

"McDonald's Is Not Our Kind of Place," is an essay written by Amitai Etzioni. In this essay, Amitai expresses his views on teenagers who work for fast food restaurants who do not get the experiences that enhance character formation and moral education they need for their futures. In Amitai's opinion, he feels as if these kinds of jobs are not teaching teenagers responsibility. Amitai compairs working and learning the "fruits of labor, and trade" while developing self-discipline. While the fast food industry is nothing more then a lemonade stand. 

These types of jobs have little initiative, creativity, or rearranging. With that being said, jobs like McDonalds; may be an easy way out for teens. It provides them a steady income that may be affecting the attendance and involvement when it comes to getting an education. 

Even though jobs may help teens learn teamwork and working under supervision. Or, no supervision at all, without adults to reach out to or mature figure. What compensation is earned from the job might be used to support themselves, or savings for college. Others may use it solely for the newest teen craze. 

I agree with everything Amaital mentions in this essay. I have seen it first hand, and lived it as well. I was 14 years old when I got my first job at a family restaurant. My earnings were used toward my cell phone bill, as well as entertainment. My parents did not give me money for clothing or extra things that I wanted. Since I was 14 years old, I have paid for things on my own. I will say that having a job at a young age taught me responsibility, self-discipline as well as not bettering my educational skills. 

Having a job at a young age, and making money of your own is a good feeling. It is mentioned that teens may choose work over education, and having a job that effects schooling is true. In high school, I can remember leaving school many times because I was called into work, and I did it because I wanted the money, not because I needed the money, and because it was easy money. 

Looking back, I feel that having a job at such a young age definitely had an effect on my education. I feel as though I focused more on my jobs then I did my education. In my opinion, it is not worth it. I missed out on high school basics for some easy money, and a repetitive job that got me nowhere. 

Blog #9

         Serve or Fail is written by the author Dave Eggers who is knows for his memoir, "A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius."Dave Eggers suggests that college students should be required to give hours of public service, as a requirement of graduation.
         Dave questions his readers on whether or not college students deserve time off from school. He states, "Well, yes and no. Yes, because finals week is stressful and sleep-deprived and possibly involves trucker-style stimulants. No, because a good deal of the four years of college is spent playing football." Dave feels as though there are to many hours in days and weeks, that being able to give a few hours with the community would be a positive thing-and colleges should require it as a service requirement to graduate.
          According to Eggers, College students may me more involved, have time for, and benefit from community services, as well as higher maturity levels and more capable of multitasking. Whereas high school students are most likely not going to benefit from, and have less time. Eggers understands that this kind of requirement will not work for every college, considering community college students generally have family and work demands.
         Eggers stresses it is more beneficial for for colleges to give credit for community services to students who are more then likely learning from those suffering from domestic abuse, then students who are earning credit in a physical education class.
         I agree with Eggers reasoning on community service. I think that community service would be beneficial to more then just the students. Volunteering to help others no matter what the situation is at hand, can be a learning experience and even life changing. I think if colleges were to make this a requirement or give students a choice to do community service instead of taking classes that they do not need, or classes they will not benefit from is a much better idea. Who knows, some might end up being a lifelong volunteer with Eggers.

Blog 8

       I read an article titled, "Sex-Ed Amendment Struck from ND Abortion Bill, from CBS News. This article is about North Dakota lawmakers who are negotiating the final details of an anti-abortion measure that "killed"an amendment that threatened a three-year, $1.2 million federal sex education grant for North Dakota State University. A committee of six voted with the bill to delete the amendment. The bills aims to outlaw abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy based on the dispute that a fetus can feel main at 20 weeks. The issue is the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court rule that legalized abortion up until 24 weeks.
       The grant that North Dakota State University had been funded for voluntary sex education for those between ages 15-19 with parental consent. The grant was frozen after some questioned whether it would violate a state law that forbids government funding to those that encourage abortion.
       I feel that this is a big issue. My opinion on abortion is that it is a womans' choice. I feel that in some situations such as rape then abortion should be legal. Otherwise I feel that women should step up  and face the consequences of there actions. I do not see abortion as an easy way out, and I am not for it, nor am I against it.
        I believe that sex education is very important. It can help make teens understand and use precaution when in situations such as these. If the amendment were to take away the grant to fund sex education I think it would be a big mistake. I think sex education is important for everyone to learn from. I will say that I am with the bill where abortions after 20 weeks should be outlawed. In my opinion I feel that 20 weeks is to long, and has developed a great amount.
        I realize that this is a very touchy subject to talk about, and I'm sorry if I offended anyone.

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2013/04/02/sex-ed-amendment-struck-from-nd-abortion-bill/